Henry Colburn
BGC Fields of the Future Fellow 2021-22
Parthian Art Is Still a Problem
“In 1935 Mikhail Rostovtzeff (1870–1952) published a 150-page essay entitled ‘Dura and the Problem of Parthian Art.’ Using a corpus of visual evidence from his ongoing excavations at Dura-Europos, he made the pioneering argument that Parthian art was a cogent and vibrant phenomenon. He saw it as descended from Achaemenid and other Iranian precursors and frequently entangled creatively with Greek and Mesopotamian traditions, rather than being merely an obscure interlude in the history of ancient art. The full significance of this argument went unappreciated for much of the twentieth century, however, and despite achieving some recognition as a minor classic the essay has faded into the background of Parthian and Dura studies alike. In this talk I shall argue that Parthian art is still a ‘problem’ and that Rostovtzeff’s essay remains the best lens through which to view it. I will also outline my larger project to produce a new edition of this seminal text, with an introduction and two additional chapters, in order to make it newly available to both scholars and students. My goal is to create a prolegomena to the study of Parthian art.”
Tuesday, September 14, 12:15–1:15 pm
|